Coverage

Pricing

Blog

Back to Blog

Guides

A Record 97% Favorite Lost the Race: Bookmakers Still Lost the Bet

September 12, 2026

On September 8th, 2026, a horse went off at odds of 1-33 in a three-runner race at Goodwood. That price means the market saw it as roughly a 97% chance to win. It finished second.

This post isn’t about horse racing. It’s about what a price that short actually promises you, which is less than most people think, and why the bookmakers who set that price still ended up losing money on the race. Both lessons apply directly to any sport you actually bet.


What Happened?

The race was the Cleansing Service Group Novice Stakes at Goodwood. A 10-furlong race with only three runners. The favorite, Najidi Storm trained by Harry Charlton and ridden by Lewis Edmunds went off at 1-33. That is a fractional price: you’d need to stake 33$ to win 1$.

Najidi Storm finished second (Link to race). The winner, Wreck It Ronnie, ridden by Kieren Fox went off at 10-1, a price that implies less than a 10% chance. The third horse finished 76 lengths further back.

The result set a British record. Najidi Storm became the shortest-priced beaten favorite in the sport’s history, beating the previous joint record of 1-25, held by Doom (2023) and Royal Forest (1948).


What 1-33 Actually Means?

A fractional price of 1-33 converts to an implied probability of about 97.1%. Here’s the plain math: 33 plus 1 equals 34, and 33 divided by 34 is roughly 0.971.

That number is not a guarantee. It’s a statement that if you saw this exact situation happen many times, the favorite would win about 97 times out of 100 and lose about 3 times out of 100. Three times out of 100 is rare. It is not zero.

This is the part that’s easy to forget when a price gets extreme. A 97% chance still has a real, non-zero chance of being on the wrong side. Najidi Storm’s race was one of the roughly 3-in-100 outcomes where the short-priced side loses. Nothing broke. The math worked exactly as it was supposed to. The losing side of the probability just showed up.


Why did the Bookmakers lose Money anyway?

You’d expect a bookmaker to profit when the overwhelming favorite loses. That’s usually true since most of the money in the race would have backed the favorite. This time two firms, Paddy Power and Boyle Sports, both reported a net loss on the race instead.

The reason comes down to where the money actually went. When a price gets as short as 1-33, backing the favorite returns almost nothing for the stake risked. Bettors know this so a considerable part of the market looks past the favorite entirely and backs the horse most likely to actually pay out if something unusual happens, in this case Wreck It Ronnie at 10-1. When a horse is priced that short bettors go looking elsewhere.

So the payouts on the smaller amount of money at 10-1 outweighed what the bookmakers kept from the larger amount of money at 1-33. The extreme price didn’t just fail to protect them, it actively pushed money toward the side that ended up winning.


The Lesson that Applies to Every Sport 

Whatever sport you actually follow, this same math shows up constantly. A heavy favorite at 1.05 in a football match, a big favorite in a tennis match, a boxer heavily favored to win a fight: any short price is a statement of high probability, but never a guarantee. If you see enough short-priced favorites over a long enough run, some of them will lose. That’s not a flaw in the market, it’s what 97% chance actually means.

Every price a bookmaker offers has their margin baked into it, not just the true probability. That’s what de-vigging strips out: it takes the offered price and removes the bookmaker’s cut showing you the fair probability underneath. The only way to know if a bet has real value is to compare the fair, de-vigged probability against what you’re actually being offered.

BetUnfair’s Margin and De-Vig tools do this on every match you look up so you’re comparing real probabilities instead of raw prices. It won’t stop a 97% favorite from losing three times out of a hundred. It will stop you from mistaking a short price for a safe bet in the first place.


FAQ

What does a 1-33 price actually mean?
It’s a fractional betting price meaning you’d stake 33 to win 1. Converted to a probability, it works out to about 97.1%, the market’s estimate of how likely that outcome is, not a guarantee.

How rare is a 1-33 favorite losing?
Rare, but not impossible. A 97% chance still loses about 3 times out of every 100 tries in the long run. This race was one of those times.

Why would a bookmaker lose money when the favorite loses?
Because short prices push bettors toward the other side of the market. If enough money backs the underdog instead, the payout on that side can outweigh what the bookmaker keeps from the favorite’s smaller potential payout.

Does this apply outside horse racing?
Yes. Any sport with a heavily favored side works the same way. A 97% implied probability in football or tennis carries the same real, small chance of the other outcome.

What’s the actual lesson for a value bettor?
Don’t judge a price by how short or long it looks. Compare the de-vigged fair probability to what’s being offered. That comparison is the same whether the price is 1.03 or 15.00.


Start Comparing Real Probabilities, Not just Prices

A short price feels safe. The math behind it says something more specific: a high probability, not a certainty. Start your free 5-day BetUnfair trial at betunfair.io and use the De-Vig and Margin tools to see the real probability behind any price before you decide it’s safe.


Keywords: implied probability · de-vigged odds · betting favorites · odds explained · value betting · sports betting odds · bookmaker margin · fair odds · betting probability · sharp betting